Just as a rabbi may not permit that which is forbidden, so must he be careful not esatto forbid that which is permitted. Therefore, if per rabbi must forbid something merely because of a question of law, because of verso custom, or because of special circumstances, he must state his reason so as not esatto establish an erroneous precedent.

Nevertheless, it is forbidden for per city to split into two congregations primarily because of per dispute over law or practice

A rabbi should be careful not puro render an unusual or anomalous decision, unless he carefully explains the reasons for it. Therefore, any uncommon decision that depends on subtle or esoteric reasoning should not be publicized, lest it lead puro erroneous conclusions. It is for this reason that there are cases which are permitted only mediante the case of per scholar, and which may not be taught puro the ignorant.

When a rabbi renders per decision con verso case con which there are niente affatto clear precedents, he must strive onesto bring as many proofs as possible…

When a rabbi renders verso decision sopra a question of law, the Torah recognizes it as binding. Therefore, when verso rabbi decides on a case and forbids something, it becomes intrinsically forbidden.

Since the initial decision renders the subject of per case intrinsically forbidden, it cannot be permitted even by a greater sage or by a majority rule.

An erroneous decision cannot render per case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if a second rabbi is able puro spettacolo that the original decision is refuted by generally accepted authorities or codes, he may reverse the original decision.

Similarly, per decision that is retracted with good reason does not render per case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if per second rabbi is able puro determine that common practice traditionally opposes the initial ong authorities, he may convince the first rabbi puro retract his decision and permit the case durante question. Individual logic and judgment, however, are not considered sufficient reason for per rabbi esatto reverse even his own decision…

Mediante order puro prevent controversy, one should not present a case before per rabbi without informing him of any previous decisions associated with that particular case.

One rabbi can hookup overturn the decision of another only if he can prove the initial decision sicuro be erroneous

Although the Torah demands per excretion degree of uniformity sopra practice, it does recognize geographical differences. Therefore, different communities may follow varying opinions per minor questions of Torah law.

However, where there is in nessun caso geographical or similar justification for varied practices, such differences are liable esatto be associated with ideological divergences and are forbidden. Within verso celibe community, the Torah requires a high degree of uniformity mediante religious practice. Durante giammai case should it be made preciso appear that there is more than one Torah.

It is written, “You are children of God your Lord; you must not mutilate yourselves (lo tit-godedu)” (Deut. 14:1). Just as it is forbidden to mutilate one’s body, so is it prohibited puro mutilate the body of Judaism by dividing it into factions. Esatto do so is sicuro disaffirm the universal fatherhood of God and the unity of His Torah.

It is therefore forbidden for members of verso solo congregation to form factions, each following per different practice or opinion. It is likewise forbidden for a celibe rabbinical court sicuro issue a split decision.

However, where per city has more than one congregation, or more than one rabbinical trapu, the following of each one is counted as per separate community, and each one may follow different practices.